Disturbing: Inbreeding is a huge problem in the Muslim world

| June 13 2013
Christopher Cook

The knee-jerk response of the typical lefty upon reading that headline is to resort to calumny to discredit any who would dare raise such an issue. Islamophobe! Racist! Jingoist! Of course, as the author of this stunning piece points out, the truly compassionate position is one of concern for this terribly damaging situation.

How damaging is it? The whole piece is an absolute must read, but here’s a shocking sample of just how bad the situation is:

Today, 70 percent of all Pakistanis are inbred and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 “More stillbirths among immigrants“). A rough estimate reveals that close to half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred. A large percentage of the parents that are blood related come from families where intermarriage has been a tradition for generations.

BBC investigation in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin. The Times of India affirmed that “this is thought to be linked to the probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders.”

The BBC’s research also discovered that while British Pakistanis accounted for just 3.4% of all births in Britain, they accounted for 30% of all British children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality. It is not a surprise, therefore, that, in response to this evidence, a Labour Party MP has called for a ban on first-cousin marriage.

Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths. One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the risk that the child dies during labor increases by 50 percent. The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders — e.g., cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy — is 18 times higher. Risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Mental health is also at risk: the probability of depression is higher in communities where consanguine marriages are also high. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.

And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 (criterion for being “retarded”) increases 400 percent among children from cousin marriages. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.” Another study found that Indian Muslim school boys whose parents were first cousins tested significantly lower than boys whose parents were unrelated in a non-verbal test on intelligence.

It is estimated that one third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a foreign background. Sixty four percent of school children in Denmark with Arabic parents are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The same study concludes that in reading ability, mathematics, and science, the pattern is the same: “The bilingual (largely Muslim) immigrants’ skills are exceedingly poor compared to their Danish classmates.”

These problems within Islam bring many detriments to Western countries. Expenses related to mentally and physically handicapped Muslim immigrants, for instance, severely drain the budgets and resources of our societies. Look at Denmark, for example: one third of the budget for the country’s schools is spent on children with special needs. Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among these children. More than half of all children in schools for children with mental and physical handicaps in Copenhagen are foreigners — of whom Muslims are by far the largest group. One study concludes that “foreigners inbreeding costs our municipalities millions” because of the many handicapped children and adults.

We highly recommend reading the rest.

If this is true—and it looks like the author has done extensive research—then the conflict between the West and Islam may be even more irremediable than we realize. What’s the one thing that is more dangerous than someone who believes the killing or subjugation of infidels is a religious imperative?

Someone who believes the killing or subjugation of infidels is a religious imperative AND is suffering from congenital schizophrenia.


Inbreeding is also very common in ultra-orthodox Jewish communities. They're small communities and only marry within their own sects. Marrying cousins is also common -- read Chaim Potak's The Chosen if you don't believe me.

Of course, most conservatives dare not apply the same standards of scrutiny to Jews as to Muslims. Modern conservatives are as politically correct, in their own way, as are liberals.


Why is this disturbing. I think we should encourage this, so that more such idiots are born and this violent religion dies a natural death.


Those who are being so politically-correct that they refuse to see indisputable facts in front of them will hopefully also dwindle in numbers because of that ignorance that eventually stops them from propagating. A similar outcry happened when researchers first wanted to study the higher incidence of sickle-cell anemia among black people. They were initially targeted as racist for choosing to look into a "black disease." It was simply genetic and did indeed require deeper study in order to understand and reverse the problem. It was certainly NOT racist.


My question to those people is this: Should we simply not discuss this problem and allow these people to continue to inbreed so that nature can take over to eventually decimate this segment of our population? But I rather doubt that's what is behind their logic.

WesternFreePress moderator

 @RobertinSeattle Yes, for the cognoscenti, political correctness is not an end unto itself, but rather a cudgel with which to beat from the public square those who oppose their statist aims.