What Christian video provoked latest terrorist attack on Obama’s watch?

| April 22 2013
Mike DeVine

And at what Ivy League school will the surviving Boston Bombing “religion of peace” terrorist be named professor upon his release from prison? Or will the Left demand that charge be dropped against him since he wasn’t Mirandized soon enough after he was captured by police? After all, months from now, can’t we be confident that the “What-difference-at-this-point-does-it-make?-wisdom” of the smartest woman on the planet and first lady-President-of-the-United States-in-waiting, will obtain?

Think all this is absurd? After Benghazi and the post-9/11 BushLied Era (defined by the Democrats’ rhetoric and actions as when Iraq failed to blossom into Connecticut within 72 hours after Saddam was captured after relying on the same WMD-intel that Bill Clinton relied upon), you shouldn’t. And let me be the first Republican to ask, much as so many Democrats did so soon after 9/11/2001:

Why do they still hate us after four years of Hillary and Barack?

Think it’s too soon after Boston to exercise Hillary-inspired patriotic debate? I don’t. This is a teachable moment on how, despite the killing of Osama bin Laden on this re-elected Democratic president’s watch, historically weak is his party on national security, even if the first successful terrorist bombings since Oklahoma City in 1995  and the World Trade Center in 1993 cannot be directly tied to that weakness.

The fact is that the Homeland was kept safe from terror under the post-9/11 regime constructed by Republican President George W. Bush. The fact is that only after the Democratic Party President and Secretary of State (who de-funded troops in the field while senators and who opposed the nose-swabbings of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that led to the intel that made President Barack Obama’s greatest and only foreign policy triumph possible) took office, did the Times Square and Underwear bombers’ near misses, Fort Hood slaughter and Boston bombings occur.

Does it deter homegrown terrorists for Democrats to nominate for president a man whose political coming out party was in the home of Weather Underground bombers Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, celebrated academics in his Chicago academic community? Or that Columbia University gladly weathered the storm of their recent hiring of Underground alum, Kathy Boudin?

I know, what storm? The “mainstream media” protects its radicals, whether they teach at Ivy League schools, kill babies still partially in the womb or only recently exited wombs in Philly, or are Puerto Rican terroists pardoned by a president whose First lady needed the PR terror vote in her run to become the junior carpet-bagging senator from the Empire State.

Have the “diversity and tolerance” (for all but Christians, conservatives, Southerners  and white males) messages of the Democrats over the past 40+ years sent a message of strength to would-be Islamist terrorists? Were the Tsarnaev brothers made more or less likely to commit acts of terror with an attorney general in office who did pro bono work for their ilk  after 9/11; sought to close Gitmo and have KSM star in an anti-Bush and Cheney show trial in Manhattan; and promised to read OBL his Miranda rights if he had been captured? Yet, we learn that the FBI (rightfully, thank God) delayed begging Dzhokar Tsarnaev to lawyer- and clam-up soon after his arrest. Funny how the immediate threat of more bombings can occasionally, even with radical leftists like Eric Holder, concentrate the “responsibility for my watch” mind.

I’m reminded of a strange statement President Obama made to Bob Woodward three years ago when asked what kept him up at night as his greatest worry. The President didn’t suffer insomnia fretting over how best to prevent terrorist acts. No, he resorted to counting sheep over how best to respond quickly to terror AFTER it occurs. Of course, we need to be vigilant in first response preparations, but when the nation is governed by such Democratic sheep, it’s no wonder that young punks can more easily think of themselves as lions capable of slaughter on our streets.

When the ideological brothers of the Boston Marathon Bombing brothers were slaughtering Iranians in the streets, President Obama begged an audience with the Mullahs doing the slaughter. Hillary Clinton and John Kerry argued to restore diplomatic relations with the so-called “reformer” Assad in Syria before his slaughter. Hillary’s closest aide is the proud daughter of Muslim Sister and Brotherhoodies, many of whose sympathizers work in the Obama Administration that handed over Egypt to those progenitors of al Qaeda.

Osama bin Laden famously miscalculated in 2001 that there was no significant difference between a Democrat Bill Clinton and Republican George W. Bush. After all, after the African Embassy and US Cole bombings, OBL went  into hiding, so sure was he that the US would invade his Afghanistan safe haven. When he saw that we were the “weak horse” and a “paper tiger”, he failed to gather intel on the difference between Democrats and Republicans on national security since Bill Clinton campaigned for George McGovern.

All terrorist have to fear from the Obamas of the world are the surrenders of wars won by Republicans (see Iraq) and yes, some occasional drones. But their noses will never we swabbed, those that slander the Prophet of Islam will not own the future, and one day they could teach Howard Zinn’s anti-American history at Harvard.

0 comments