Sequester Cuts Fall Mostly on National Defense
“Sequestration” is a series of automatic budget cuts totaling $1.2 trillion, including interest savings, which will go into effect soon. These cuts will impose 50 percent of reductions on defense, which represents only 17 percent of federal spending in 2013. In contrast, mandatory spending accounts for 64 percent of the budget in 2013… but receives only 15 percent of the sequestration cuts.
See the chart below.
The sequester is another one of Obama’s red herrings:
- First, it was Obama’s idea, and now he is trying to blame others for not fixing it.
- Second, it isn’t designed to fix anything anyway.
It is reasonable to say that there is some waste and room for trimming at the Pentagon. But it is folly for the Pentagon to take the brunt of the cuts, when the biggest waste in our government is found in non-defense discretionary spending, and when the actual existential economic threat is coming from mandatory spending.
The sequester was never designed to fix the problem. The sequester, like everything else Obama is doing now, was designed to be a land mine for the Republicans. They made the cuts unbalanced so that the Republicans would be compelled to . . .
A) seek to protect our national defense and
B) likely to decry the whole arrangement as being unfair
. . . whereupon Obama can call them obstructionists. Obama is simply spinning a series of propeller blades, hoping the GOP will walk into them. This isn’t about helping the country. This is all about 2014.