McSally can no longer catch up. The AIRC’s work is complete.

| November 17 2012
Christopher Cook

“The race for the 2nd Congressional District had been too close to call for 10 days, but on Friday an Arizona Republic analysis determined that McSally would not be able to muster enough votes from the remaining uncounted ballots to surpass the thin lead Barber had held in recent days.”

So says the Arizona Republic. If their analysis holds up, it will mean that Democrats won the three districts in Arizona that were considered competitive. Part of the reason, of course, is that the night generally did not go well for Republicans across the nation. Mitt Romney had no coattails, for he did not win, and it was starting to seem more clear that he was not going to win several hours before the polls closed in Arizona. This probably had a bandwagon effect for Democrats, and it may have depressed just enough GOP turnout to be the difference in a close race. And all three races were close.

But the larger reason is the perfidy of the AIRC and the anti-democratic (small-d) process of “independent” redistricting in general. One of the reasons for redistricting to be a political process (that is, done by the state legislature) is so that the process is undertaken by the elected representatives of the people. That way, the process more closely reflects the will of the people, and those who undertake the process are subject to accountability by the people in the form of elections.

Arizona is a Republican state. The ranks of independents have been growing, but Democrats are losing more to indies than Republicans, and Democrats are now outnumbered by both Republicans and independents. At last check . . .

  • Republicans: 1,142,605 registered voters
  • Independents: 1,010,725 registered voters
  • Democrats: 1,008,689 registered voters

And yet, it now looks like there will be more Democrats in Arizona’s congressional delegation than Republicans (5-4). That does not reflect the makeup of Arizona, nor does it truly reflect the “will of the people.” Those three “competitive” congressional districts were drawn by the AIRC to be close, but won by Democrats. If the elected representatives of the people had controlled the process, the delegation would be 6-3 or 7-2, which would far more closely reflect the state of Arizona, in which Democrats are outnumbered by both Republicans and independents.

Instead of a process governed by scores of legislators, elected by the people and accountable to the people, we got a process involving a handful of people in a smoky back room, with no accountability if they decided to game the system. And, as expected, and as we warned, the Democrats gamed the system.

2 comments
dleeper47
dleeper47 moderator

Is the AIRC a permanent fixture in Arizona politics?  Can the legislature take back its traditional role in redistricting?  Do we need a ballot proposition to make that happen?  If Arizona citizens want to avoid AIRC perfidy in the future, when is the best time to start the "take-back"?  

realist
realist

Remember the May 12, 2012 AZGOP convention fiasco to elect National Delegates. Of course the democrats took over the redistricting process. With the stooges currently in control of AZGOP it's a wonder anything goes right for the GOP in this state.