Prop 121 — pushing up daisies?

| October 26 2012
Hannah Thoreson

Prop 121 would create a top two primary system that would eliminate partisan primaries in favor of so-called “open elections.”  Numerous arguments have been made by citizens of nearly every political viewpoint as to why the change advocated for by the Open Government Committee is a bad idea.

The biggest reason Prop 121 has struggled to obtain popular support is that it would leave many voters with no candidate representing their opinions in the general election.  A lot of districts at the legislative or Congressional level are drawn in such a way that voters would end up choosing between two candidates with the same ideas in the general election.  The open election format would also likely draw numerous sham candidates for each position as political parties attempt to use the new system to seek an edge.  Voters would be left attempting to sort through heaps of campaign materials to determine the most strategic way to cast their ballot instead of simply choosing the candidate they like the most.

Both major parties are opposed to the initiative, as are third parties who will have little chance of being able to field general election candidates should the proposed system come into effect.  Many Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Greens, and members of other parties believe that eliminating partisan primaries strips the organizations of their right to select their own candidate to represent them on the ballot.  Some even go so far as to say that Prop 121 potentially violates the First Amendment.

Only 37% of Arizona voters said they would vote in favor of open primaries in the latest Rasmussen survey.

Recently, the Yes on 121 signs started sporting odd photos of daisies attached to their signs across the Valley.

We tried to figure out what message the Yes side was pushing, and we found this video:

 

But perhaps the additions to the Prop 121 signs are something more prophetic — is the campaign for open elections “pushing up daisies”?  Or are they trying to warn us?

7 comments
Rugby Matches
Rugby Matches

I'm keen this unique approach. I just discovered your website for the purpose of at first chance not to mention had become a freakout. Have post for the reason that I am going to read through it again regular.

formation
formation

Thanks for making the Essay to interact this, I expect strongly over it and coitus acquisition regarding this volume. If at all behave able, since you wax skillfulness, do you fear updating your website with unscheduled assemblage? It is kind of effective for me.

FrankHenry
FrankHenry

A YES vote for 121 is a positive vote for every voter in Arizona. A YES for 121 will allow all voters: 1. EQUAL ACCESS to be placed on every ballot. 2. EQUAL ACCESS to vote on every ballot. And the voters will continue to have access and hear the opinions of all political parties and lobby groups...

WesternFreePress
WesternFreePress moderator

@ReZampAnything designed to be "non-partisan" should be extremely suspect. The left is notorious for gaming supposedly "independent" systems.

WesternFreePress
WesternFreePress moderator

 @FrankHenry A YES vote is a vote for just another back-door effort by parties who are losing traction in the state to stanch that bleeding. Just like Prop 106/the AIRC, it's an attempt to do an end-run around the fact that they are losing the support of the people of Arizona.