Study: Smaller government equals better economy

| June 7 2012
Christopher Cook

Apropos of our earlier posts on Keynesianism/Obamanomics’ failure to produce jobs or economic growth, even though it claims that government spending is essential to doing so . . .

We discover from a study of OECD nations that the opposite is the case:

Econometric analysis of advanced [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development] countries for the period 1965-2010 finds that a higher tax to [Gross Domestic Product] ratio has a statistically significant, negative effect on growth. For example, an increase in the tax to GDP ratio of 10 percentage points is found to lower annual per capita GDP growth by 1.2 percentage points. […]

“Between 2003 and 2012, real GDP growth was 3.1% a year for small government countries (i.e. where both government outlays and receipts were on average below 40% of GDP for the years 1999 to 2009), compared to 2.0% for big government countries.

There are also the data from Estonia. Hit hard by the Great Recession, the instituted REAL austerity measures, and now they’re the only European economy that is really booming. This has started a Twitter flaming incident between the Estonian president, who is proud of his country’s achievements, and Paul Krugman, the Keynesian avatar.

Not that data ever stops them. The statist project is undying.They’re sure that they’re right, and they’re sure that you’re wrong.

“You must stand clear, or be trodden underfoot.”



  1. […] revolution. The lower spending surely played a positive role, though, especially given what economic data have long shown about the connection between lower government spending and economic […]